Written by Olivia Nater | Published: September 12, 2025
The Economist editorial board recently published a welcome article arguing that low fertility is nothing to panic about. We responded with a letter, which wasn’t published, so we are featuring it here.
We encourage all our members and supporters to make their voices heard! See our media guide for advice on how to do that.
How refreshing that a leading current affairs magazine and respected voice on economic issues is pushing back against “baby bust” alarmism. In light of the worrying rise of far-right pronatalism that is seeking to turn women into incubators, your editorial is much appreciated.
A people shortage should be the least of our worries. As you say, our global population is still growing and a significant decline is very far off. If the UN’s projection holds true, then no one alive today will experience a population that is smaller than today’s 8.2 billion.
You note that “adapting to an emptier planet will not be easy”, but it will be far easier than dealing with catastrophic environmental breakdown due to the steadily worsening breach of vital planetary boundaries. Not to mention that some of the most effective ways to lessen the socioeconomic impacts of population aging, including investments in preventive healthcare and child welfare (to maximize productivity), benefit everyone.
Sincerely,
Olivia Nater
Communications Manager
Population Connection
